http://hawaii-kau.com/catalog/products.php?Pakini_Nui_Wind_Farm
Myth 1: Wind Turbines Don't Impact The Earth
The concept of free energy is, in very general terms, the ability to input x amount of energy into a machine, which will output x + 1 amount of energy. This seems to conflict with the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Tesla believed the law to be incorrect. He invented the Tesla Coil as an attempt to create free energy.
If it is possible, free energy could be perfected and result in the entire planet being powered by a single power source, such as a nuclear power plant, and output all the energy anyone could ever need. An infinite supply of energy at our fingertips, all based on electric output. You can see how this would irritate the oil companies.
They are the cause of the suppression, the theory claims, as no one would have to depend on fossil fuels anymore. Electric input is just as viable as coal input, or gasoline input. Thus, the electricity required to power a lightbulb could be all we need to power the whole world, invent spacecrafts capable of interstellar travel, anti-gravity, etc.
Myth 6: Plastic Bags Are Free
www.reuseit.com/.../plastic-bags-are-free
Myth 7: Organic Label Means 100% Organic
thedailygreen.com
http://ezinearticles.com/?Prefabricated-Homes---The-Good,-The-Bad-And-The-Downright-Ugly&id=506163
Building modular is not a wise choice in building green. Buildings made from the mass production lose uniqueness and creativity. In other words, you are living in a house that looks exactly the same as your neighbor’s! Also these prefab buildings are not built specifically for the sites. Sometimes a wrong style of building would be built on an improper spot and end up using more energy in heating and cooling as required.
In addition, there seems to be very little evidence that prefabricated homes actually reduce wastage. Nobody could guarantee a building to be 100% perfect. In case when one of the popular modular designs has a problem, then lots of buildings with that particular design under mass production would need to get immediate repair and maintenance. This could actually increase the amount of wastage in manufacture and transport.
“50% less plastic eco bottle!” This is just a beautiful lie from the bottled water industry. Plastic bottles can never be considered as “eco”. Exempt from many state deposit laws, and most often used away from home, where recycling bins are scarce, the majority of water bottles do not make it into the recycling stream. No matter how recyclable and eco-friendly the plastic bottles are, plastic is plastic and the plastic bottles we knock back always end up into landfills as result.
http://lighterfootstep.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ecofina_600-590x393.jpg
http://www.greenpeace.org/australia/admin/image-library2/waste-china
http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/inline/blog/Image/computer-recycling-electronic-waste.jpg
Paper bags are not better than plastic bags. It takes more than four times as much energy to manufacture a paper bag as it does to manufacture a plastic bag. During the manufacturing process, paper sacks generate 70% more air and 50 times more water pollutants than plastic bags. Although paper bags have a higher recycling rate than plastic, each new paper grocery bag you use is made from mostly virgin pulp for better strength and elasticity. Both virgin and recyclable paper come from tree pulp, so the impact of paper bag production on forests is enormous.
-_DSC2350.jpg)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar